Supporting Motorbike Accident Victims with Head Injuries


This comprehensive guide dives into the complexities surrounding motorbike accidents, specifically focusing on the daunting challenges faced by victims with debilitating head injuries. We understand the immense emotional and physical toll such accidents can inflict, and our aim is to provide valuable information and resources to empower both victims and their loved ones during this difficult time.

The Impact of a Motorbike Accident: A Case Study

A Story of Negligence and Devastating Consequences

To illustrate the legal intricacies and potential consequences of a motorbike accident involving head injuries, let’s examine a real-life case study. This case revolves around Mr. Owens, a victim who sustained serious head injuries as a passenger on a single-person quad bike driven by Mr. Lewis, a minor and the owner’s insured.

A Risky Ride: The Circumstances Leading to Head Injury

Mr. Owens, a teenager at the time of the accident, agreed (albeit reluctantly) to be a passenger on a quad bike driven by his friend, Mr. Lewis, another teenager who lacked a license and insurance for the vehicle. The decision to use the quad bike for transportation, rather than a safer alternative like walking, stemmed from Mr. Lewis’ suggestion. Tragically, this choice led to Mr. Owens suffering catastrophic head trauma.

A Collision with Consequences: Injuries Sustained

While traveling at an excessive speed on the main road, Mr. Owens lost his grip and fell, suffering a fractured skull, a subdural hematoma (bleeding within the skull), and post-traumatic amnesia. These traumatic head injuries, particularly the amnesia, significantly impacted Mr. Owens’ ability to recall the accident. Additionally, he experienced a loss of taste and smell, along with potential balance problems.

The Role of Helmets: Mitigation and Controversy in Head Injury Cases

The case delves into the crucial role helmets play in mitigating head injuries sustained during motorbike accidents. Both parties presented expert witnesses specializing in neurosurgery to analyze the potential impact a helmet could have had on Mr. Owens’ injuries.


Expert Opinions: Divergent Views on Helmet Efficacy in Preventing Head Injury

While there was agreement that Mr. Owens suffered a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by both linear and rotational forces, the experts diverged on the extent to which a helmet could have lessened the severity. Mr. Owens’ expert argued that current helmet testing methods fail to adequately account for the dynamic forces involved in real-world accidents, potentially leading to underestimation of head injury protection. Conversely, Mr. Lewis’ expert maintained that helmets offer significant real-world benefits, potentially reducing the initial TBI severity and preventing lasting brain damage had Mr. Owens worn one.

The Legal Battleground: Establishing Fault and Compensation for Head Injuries
Accepting Responsibility: Admissions of Negligence

Mr. Lewis conceded negligence in carrying Mr. Owens as a passenger on a vehicle not designed for multiple occupants. However, he contested negligence regarding his driving speed and manner. Furthermore, he argued contributory negligence on Mr. Owens’ part, citing his agreement to be a passenger, precarious handhold, and lack of a helmet. He contended that these factors warranted a 65% reduction in potential compensation for Mr. Owens’ head injuries.


Acknowledging Mistakes: Mr. Owens’ Contributory Negligence in Head Injury Case

Mr. Owens admitted some fault in agreeing to be a passenger and not wearing a helmet. However, he argued for a more modest 20% reduction in compensation.

The Judge’s Verdict: Weighing the Evidence in Head Injury Case

The judge, after meticulously reviewing the evidence, determined contributory negligence on Mr. Owens’ part but placed the majority of blame on Mr. Lewis. Factors influencing this decision included:

  • Mr. Lewis’ primary negligence: His decision to use the quad bike for passenger transportation and his excessive speed were deemed highly negligent, exceeding the expected behavior of a prudent teenager.
  • Mr. Owens’ relative inexperience: Compared to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Owens lacked experience with quad bikes and potentially deferred to his friend’s judgment, increasing the risk of head injury.
  • The inherent risk of the situation: Combining riding on a vehicle not designed for passengers with the lack of a helmet significantly increased the risk of injury, particularly serious head trauma.

Ultimately, the judge concluded that Mr. Owens’ contributory negligence amounted to 30%, reflecting the shared responsibility for the accident.


Key Takeaways from the Case:

This case sheds light on several crucial points for motorbike accident victims with head injuries:

  • The Court’s Perspective on Passenger Contributory Negligence: The court distinguished this case from situations involving passengers entering a vehicle with a drunk driver, where a typical 20% deduction might apply. The manner of the driver’s actions, including speed and reckless behaviour, can significantly influence the passenger’s contributory negligence percentage.
  • Helmet Efficacy and Expert Disagreement: This case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding helmet testing methodologies and their effectiveness in mitigating rotational forces. While the judge ultimately accepted the expert’s opinion that helmets offer protection against both


The Aftermath: A Path to Recovery

The road to recovery after a motorbike accident with a head injury can be long and challenging. This guide has equipped you with valuable information, but remember, you don’t have to navigate this alone.

Claim Today is here to help. Our team of experienced professionals understands the complexities of head injury claims and can guide you through the legal process to secure the compensation you deserve.

Contact Claim Today today for a free consultation.


claim-today-clock-Thumbs Up-pose

We've made it very easy to get advice